Legal Opinion

Hammerstrom v. Toy Nat. Bank of Sioux City

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1936No. Nos. 10282-10284, 10287-10289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

There are here three appeals by the defendants (in each case the county treasurer and board of supervisors of Wood-bury county, Iowa), and three cross-appeals by the respective plaintiffs (two national banks and a federal joint stock land bank) from judgments entered respectively for plaintiffs in three actions brought to recover taxes paid on the shares of the capital stock of the banks, alleged to have been wrongfully and illegally assessed and collected from the respective plaintiffs, for *629various years specified in the respective complaints.

The three actions were…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Public Welfare Commission v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Vidal v. Stahmann FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. In re: The Matter of TK Boat Rentals, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API