Legal Opinion

Amoco Oil Co. v. Burns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1981No. 80-3-566PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KAUFFMAN, Justice.

After a non-jury trial in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, appellee, Amoco Oil Company (“Amoco”), was awarded possession of a gasoline service station by judgment in ejectment against appellant, Robert F. Bums (“Burns”), an Amoco dealer who had refused to vacate the property after the expiration of his lease. Bums’ exceptions to the adjudication were overruled by the Common Pleas Court en banc and the Superior Court affirmed, 268 Pa.Super. 390, 408 A.2d 521 (1979). 1

Appellant contends here, as he did in the courts below, that Amoco was precluded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Consumers Oil Corporation of Trenton, New Jersey, a New Jersey Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Temp-Way Corp. v. Continental BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Loos & Dilworth v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Barn-Chestnut, Inc. v. CFM Development Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Johnson Lakes Development Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API