Hentig v. Sweet
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in Sweet v. Hentig, 24 Kas. 497, et seq., and in the opinion, infra. At the April Term, 1881, Sweet had judgment against the defendants, who bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
After the decision of this court in this case, reported in 24 Kas. 497, a second amended petition was filed, in which it was alleged among other matters, that the note and judgment are, and always have been, the property of A. H. Hentig; and that said A. H. Hentig is now, and always has been since the rendition of said judgment, a nonresident of the state of Kansas, and out of and' beyond the limits of the state of Kansas, and a resident of the state of Michigan, and has never been in the state since the rendition of said judgment. After…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pearce v. OlneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Carrington v. HolabirdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Bonifant v. DoniphanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
- Bresnehan v. PriceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Davis v. William M. Tileston & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanderson v. VoelckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Nelson v. HoskinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Wright v. CardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890