Legal Opinion

Wright v. Card

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 21, 1890Published

Exceptions to the Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, C. J.

This is debt on a replevin bond, wherein one Walter A. Howard, plaintiff in replevin, was principal, and Herbert Coy and tbe defendant were sureties. The penal sum was $50.50. The condition was, that the bond should be void if said Howard should prosecute the writ to final judgment, pay such damages and costs as Jerry A. Wright, defendant in replevin and plaintiff in this action, should recover against him, and return and restore the replevied goods in like good order and condition as when taken, in case such should be the final judgment, but otherwise should remain in full force. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sidensparker v. SidensparkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  2. Annett v. . TerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Sherry v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  4. De Armond v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Murphy v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API