Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Frisbie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1984No. 13 E.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

The issue presented by this case is whether a single unlawful act which affects multiple victims may support multiple sentences without violating the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We hold that it may.

Appellee, Charles Frisbie, while fleeing from police officers in downtown Philadelphia, drove his car through a crowded intersection and seriously injured nine pedestrians. *464Appellee then drove on and was not apprehended until his vehicle overturned on a busy expressway. As a result of this incident, appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. Garcia-RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 2005

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API