Ross v. Eichman

This is the second time this case has come before us for review. See Ross v. Eichman, 129 N.H. 477, 529 A.2d 941 (1987). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s order of specific performance in favor of the plaintiffs.

The initial appeal was the result of the denial of the plaintiffs’ petition for specific performance of a real estate contract against the defendants. Ross, 129 N.H. at 478, 529 A.2d at 942. The defendants objected to the granting of the petition and raised two defenses: first, that the plaintiffs had not met the terms of a financing contingency contained in the…