Legal Opinion

Hanslin v. Keith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 12, 1980No. 79-327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff-grantor, Emil A. Hanslin, seeks specific performance of a covenant contained in a deed and a purchase-and-sale agreement between Hanslin and the defendant-grantee, Edwin H. Keith.

Keith approached Hanslin, an expert in land architecture, and offered to sell him lot 9 on which there was an old barn. The lot is situated in a subdivision owned by Keith in New London. Hanslin, however, expressed concern about buying the lot while it was a part of an existing plan of the Keith subdivision.

As part of their negotiations, it was agreed that Hanslin would redesign the subdivision in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TuneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. MacLeod v. Chalet Susse International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Thiem v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Traficante v. PopeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Chute v. ChuteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Belrose v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Erin Food Services, Inc. v. Derry Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Mountain Springs Water Co. v. GodstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API