Legal Opinion

Terry v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1910No. N. 2118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Emma Maud Terry against Frank Peterson and Charles Creighbaum doing business as tbe St. Louis Gambling Hall, under tbe name of Peterson & Company. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

STEAUP, O. J.

Plaintiff’s husband owned in Weber County, Utah, a parcel of ground upon wMcb they and tbeir children lived. He sold it, and gambled away a portion of the proceeds of the sale. The plaintiff brought this action in her own name to recover the money from the defendants, alleged to have been gambled and lost by her husband at the defendants’ gambling house in Ogden City. The case was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict was rendered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

The assignments relate to alleged errors in the charge of the court and the court’s refusal to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spokane Canal Co. v. CoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API