Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin Geevers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 18, 2000No. 99-5155PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
The appeal of Martin Geevers, who pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud arising out of a check kiting scheme, requires us to determine once again when application of the Sentencing Guidelines may result in the imposition of a sentence on the basis of intended loss when the actual loss was significantly less. Geevers argues that because a passer of worthless checks could not possibly abscond with the full face amount of his worthless deposits, the District Court erred in calculating his intended loss under a “worst case” scenario. Though Geevers’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Mohamed Youla, A/K/A Mohamed Fofana Mohamed YoulaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Angela KhorozianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.