Legal Opinion

United States v. Angela Khorozian

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 2003No. 02-2820PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

We address the scope of the federal bank fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Angela Khorozian appeals her conviction on the ground that she could not have conspired to commit, and could not have committed, bank fraud by negotiating counterfeit checks because she did not know that those checks were counterfeit. She also alleges various errors in the District Court’s evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, and application of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm both the conviction and sentence.

I. Background

In 2000, Khorozian was approached with a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Michael C. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API