Legal Opinion

Don Maurice Randall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1954No. 13934_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury, duly "impaneled, in the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, Third Division, and found guilty of an assault with a dangerous weapon, A.C.L. § 65-4-22 1 .

Appellant, assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to grant him a continu-ancq of the trial. Affidavits of two doctors were presented in support of the motion. The trial court considered the reasons advánced insufficient and in the exercise of its discretion denied the continuance. We find no abuse of that discretion and a review of the record before us fails to disclose an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. TramaglinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  4. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Else v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hobbs v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Carl C. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API