Legal Opinion

Vent v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 16, 2012No. A-10584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether we should vacate the superior court's decision denying an application for post-conviction relief because the judge conducted independent research into the facts and then relied on those facts to reject the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We hold that the trial judge's conduct created an appearance of partiality that warrants his disqualification from this case, and that requires a new post-conviction relief hearing before a different judge.

*754Background

A jury convicted Eugene Vent of second-degree murder,1…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re: Bellsouth Corporation, in Re: Terry Price and Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price & Proctor, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Mosley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. Homer City CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RansteadAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API