State v. Ranstead
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In Roman v. State , we recognized that conditions of probation and parole "must be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of the offender and the protection of the public and must not be unduly restrictive of liberty." 1 The court of appeals recently read Roman as requiring that a sentencing court affirmatively review all probation conditions proposed in the presentence report, even if the defendant has not objected to those conditions. 2 It applied that requirement to Dean Ranstead's sentence appeal and remanded to the superior court. The State of Alaska…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- John Doe v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Ray M. Collins and Carol J. Collins v. David W. Hall and Margaret R. Hall, as Trustees of the D&M Hall Community Property Trust, dated March 14, 2005Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Adam Charles Dere v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- State of Alaska v. Falealo Manuele PulusilaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.