Hamilton's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This is a taxpayer’s appeal from a decree determining that outstanding indebtedness of the City of Philadelphia, in the sum of $59,156,500, invested in the City’s sewer system and facilities for the treatment and disposal of sewage, and the further sum or sums, not to exceed $42,000,000, now proposed to be borrowed and invested in said system and facilities and for the improvement and extension thereof, is self-liquidating utility debt within the meaning of Article IX, Section 8, of the State Constitution, and, pursuant to the provisions of the enabling Act of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Lighton v. Abington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Silkman v. Board of Water CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Calabrese v. Collier Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Yezioro v. North Fayette County Municipal AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.