State v. Bolaski
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Defendant Kyle Bolaski appeals from his conviction for second-degree murder after a jury trial. He argues that the trial court erred in (1) not instructing the jury that, to find second-degree murder, the jury had to find an absence of passion or provocation; (2) excluding evidence of the victim’s mental health history in the months before the incident; and (3) dismissing a juror during the trial because she reported having followed the case during the time of the grand jury. We do not reach the juror issue, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶ 2. The basic background to the case,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. StarkeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Tristan CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Matthew WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. David G. BuckleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Jeffrey DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Thomas S. SharrowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.