Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Mansour

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 2004No. 53206-5-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Cindy Mansour (the wife or mother) appeals a final parenting plan, order of support, decree of dissolution, and findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court following a three-day trial. She claims that the trial court erred by not including in the parenting plan statutorily-required limitations applicable to her former husband, Ghassan Mansour (the husband or father), because he physically abused their son. She also claims that the court erred in its decisions regarding child support, spousal maintenance, property division, and award of attorney fees.

Baker, J.

¶2…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harden v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. In Re The Marriage Of: Joseph C. Anthony v. Penny L. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Ben M. Thielhorn v. Cheryl ThielhornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Corey Harris And Juline Harris v. Michael FortinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API