Corey Harris And Juline Harris v. Michael Fortin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COREY HARRIS AND JULINE HARRIS, No. 71649-2-1 Appellants, DIVISION ONE CO m ~o a- v. PUBLISHED OPINION CD ''.'• MICHAEL FORTIN, CO en Respondent. FILED: September 8, 2014 Trickey, J. — The doctrine of judicial estoppel prevents a party from asserting a particular position in a judicial proceeding and later taking a clearly inconsistent position in order to gain an advantage. Here, throughout their bankruptcy proceedings, appellants maintained that a promissory note, on which respondent agreed to pay them a principal amount of $400,000.00, had…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bartley-Williams v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.