Legal Opinion

Runnells v. Citizens Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1932No. 20866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This was a suit to quiet title, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error in the district court of Oklahoma county. The relief asked for was to bar the defendants in error from any claim against lots 1 to 15 in block 15, Eckrote addition to Oklahoma City, and the charge was made that the claim of the defendants in error was based on holding some improvement bonds issued by Oklahoma City to cover the improvement of the lots.

The defendants filed an answer, claiming to own certain improvement bonds issued by Oklahoma City, the defendant Citizens National Bank setting up…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Perryman v. City Home BuildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Steele v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Baccus v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API