Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Stanley Krohn, United States of America v. William G. Hahn

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1978No. 76-2176, 76-2177PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants appeal their convictions and sentences 1 after adverse jury verdicts on a five count indictment for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1976). 2 Viewing the evidence most favorably to the Government as we must in considering these appeals after convictions, United States v. Twilligear, 460 F.2d 79, 81-82 (10th Cir.), the record tends to show the following facts.

Sometime in January, 1972, defendants created Rocky Mountain Enterprises of Denver, Inc. (RME). Defendant Hahn held the title of “President” and defendant Krohn held the title of “General…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Juan G. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Michael AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Steven v. Hershenow, Stuart M. Rosenthal, Steven A. ShraiarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API