Legal Opinion

Amory v. Wabash Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1902No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by William R. Amory against the Wabash Railroad Company to recover the value of goods lost in transit. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings érror. This is an action to recover the value of merchandise or samples, shipped by plaintiff as a passenger, and lost or stolen in transit.

Read the full summary

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by William R. Amory against the Wabash Railroad Company to recover the value of goods lost in transit. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings érror. This is an action to recover the value of merchandise or samples, shipped by plaintiff as a passenger, and lost or stolen in transit. In the conduct of his business the past six or seven years, William R. Amory, a ladies’ tailor and milliner of Detroit, had been making semi-annual visits to Paris, to secure the latest fashions, bringing back with him suits, single garments, and millinery. With these he…

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

(after stating the facts). Counsel do not disagree as to the law of the case. The statute provides for compensation for transporting any' passenger and his *407ordinary baggage, not exceeding in weight 150 pounds. 2 Comp. Laws, § 6234, subd. 9. All the authorities agree that the baggage which a passenger is entitled to have carried is the articles which are necessary and requisite for his personal convenience. Story, Bailm. § 499. If a passenger ships merchandise in his trunk without notice to the railroad company, or knowledge on its part, of the contents of the trunk, the company is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hannibal Railroad v. SwiftSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Sloman v. . Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Oakes v. N. P. R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jacobs v. TuttU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1888
  5. Lake S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. HochstimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FugattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. S. Nathan & Co. v. Red Cab, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Dahrooge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API