Legal Opinion
Sanborn v. Aranosian
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 28, 1979No. 79-203PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The sole issue presented in this case is, what is the proper measure of damages when a buyer rightfully revokes his acceptance of an automobile, pursuant to RSA 382-A:2-608, after he has driven the vehicle approximately 17,000 miles. The Master (George L. Manias, Esq.) recommended that RSA 382-A:2-711(l) be applied as the proper measure of damages and that the plaintiffs recover the total price paid for the automobile less its resale price. RSA 382-A:2-706. The Superior Court (Cann, J.) approved the master’s report and transferred the defendants’ exceptions. We affirm.
On September 14, 1976,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eckstein v. CumminsOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Asciolla v. Manter Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Werner v. MontanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Bradbury v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Merriam v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Welch v. Fitzgerald-Hicks Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Beer v. BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Johnson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- St-Laurent v. Fiermonti Oldsmobile, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.