Legal Opinion
Beer v. Bennett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 20, 2010No. 2008-808PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Terry M. Bennett, appeals a decision of the Portsmouth District Court (DeVries, J.) finding, inter alia, that he violated the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), RSA ch. 358-A (2009), in the sale of a car to the plaintiff, Douglas C. Beer. The plaintiff cross-appeals on issues related to the award of damages. We affirm.
The trial court found, or the record supports, the following facts. At the time of the transaction at issue, the defendant was a New Hampshire registered automobile dealer doing business under the name The Nickeled Stork. He posted an advertisement on his internet…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Glickman v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Snierson v. ScrutonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Cigal v. Leader Development Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Bellwether Cmty. Credit Union v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Fat Bullies Farm, LLC v. Lori Devenport & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Fin Brand v. Take 2 DoughDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.