Pioneer Grain Corp. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit Judge.
An action was brought by the appellee railway company against the appellant, as defendant, to recover demurrage charges. The defendant answered, denying its liability. It also set up a counterclaim, alleging that plaintiff was liable in damages to it for a negligent breach of duty as a common carrier to furnish ears to defendant during the times referred to in the complaint. In its reply the plaintiff denied the counterclaim; later it moved to dismiss the same. This motion was denied (D. C.) 26 F.(2d) 90. Thereafter plaintiff moved to amend its reply, by inserting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Emery v. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Radio Corp. of America v. J. H. Bunnell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Winters v. EthellSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Dyar v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King Mechanism & Engineering Co. v. Western Wheeled Scraper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940