Legal Opinion

Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. Andrews

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1934No. 9921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

Appeal from order dismissing a portion of the defendant’s answer. The plaintiff below brought suit to recover upon a policy of life insurance, issued to her husband by the defendant, in which she was named as the beneficiary. She alleged that her husband died, while the policy was in force, as the result of accidental means, and that due proof of the death from bodily injury was furnished to the insurer. The defendant answered to the plaintiff’s petition, setting forth certain defenses at law. At a later time the defendant was given leave by the court to file an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Emery v. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. J. H. Bunnell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Winters v. EthellSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. C. v. A. B. C. Fireproof Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Kneberg v. H. L. Green Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API