Legal Opinion

Easterling v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1911No. 3300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. When it appears that the clerk of the trial court has failed to transmit to the Court of Appeals within the time prescribed by law the bill of exceptions and the transcript of the record, and that an attorney for the plaintiff in error “has been the cause of the delay, by consent, direction, or procurement of any kind,” the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6185, 6186; Budden v. Brooks, 123 Ga. 882 (51 S. E. 727); Wilson v. State, 124 Ga. 30 (52 S. E. 81); Pope v. State, 93 Ga. 216 (18 S. E. 649) ; Calhoun v. State, 91 Ga. 112 (16 S. E. 379).

2. The bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Budden v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Calloway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeLoach v. KicklighterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API