Budden v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Georgia
Motion to dismiss the writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtPish, P. J.
1. Whenever it appears that the clerk of a trial court has failed to transmit to the Supreme Court, within the time prescribed by law, a bill of exceptions and transcript, and that an attorney for the plaintiff in error “has been the cause of the delay, . . by'consent, direction, or procurement of any kind, the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code, §§ 5571, 5572; Brunswick Book Co. v. Torsch Co., 112 Ga. 537; Ashley v. Howard, 99 Ga. 132.
2. The bill of exceptions in this case was filed in the clerk’s office of the superior court January 27, 1905. The transcript of the record was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ashley v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Brunswick Book Co. v. Charles H. Torsch Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Lang v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Easterling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.