Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1913No. 4910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error because the bill of exceptions and the transcript of record were, not transmitted by the clerk of the trial court within the time prescribed by law. The case is clearly within the rulings of the Supreme Court in Brunswick Book Co. v. Torsch, 112 Ga. 537 (37 S. E. 737); Wheeler v. Crawford, 135 Ga. 148 (69 S. E. 22); Wilson v. State, 124 Ga. 30 (52 S. E. 81); Budden v. Brooks, 123 Ga. 882 (51 S. E. 727); Earnhart v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 133 Ga. 59 (65 S. E. 138); Wheeler v. Mozley, 136 Ga. 586 (71 S. E. 790), and decisions of this court in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Earnhart v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Budden v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Wheeler v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Brunswick Book Co. v. Charles H. Torsch Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Union Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Fowler v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API