Legal Opinion
Brennan v. Straub
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 2003No. 02 Civ. 7655 (RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Frank G. Straub (“Straub”), Elisabeth Wallace (“Wallace”), George Gretsas (“Gretsas”) and Edward Dunphy (“Dunphy”) have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Dorothy Anne Brennan (“Brennan”) alleging violations of her civil rights in contravention of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, culminating in the termination of Brennan’s employment.
For the following reasons, that motion is granted in part and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baines v. MasielloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Kantha v. BlueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- The ANDERSON GROUP, LLC v. City of Saratoga SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Lorusso v. BorerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Belyea v. The City of Glen CoveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.