Legal Opinion

State v. Buczkowski

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 18, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

928 A.2d 85 (2007)

395 N.J. Super. 40

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Tammy BUCZKOWSKI, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted November 14, 2006.

Decided July 18, 2007.

James P. Lynch, Acting Camden County Prosecutor, for appellant (Tamika T. McKoy, Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the letter brief).

DiLorenzo & Rush, Florham Park, for respondent (Chris DiLorenzo, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, PAYNE and LIHOTZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, P.J.A.D.

The State appeals from a Law Division…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. New Concepts for Living v. HackensackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NunnallyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API