Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 2017No. Case No. 5D16-2738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Based upon our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Davis’s judgment and sentence. We remand only for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment. See Taylor v. State, 120 So.3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Despite affirmance, we remand the judgment and sentence on Count 2 for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing documents.” (citation omitted)). On re*355mand, the trial court is directed to include in the judgment the total amount of $250.00 for attorney’s fees, as orally pronounced at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Zaidman v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  2. SUZANNE EILEEN ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  3. TROY RANDLE STALTER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API