Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 2013No. 5D13-479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an Anders1 appeal in which we find no reversible error.

Despite affirmance, we remand the judgment and sentence on Count 2 for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing documents. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 84 So.3d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal, but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error). Here, the trial court habitualized appellant, Moses Taylor [“Moses”], as to Count 1 (Sale of Cocaine), but did not provide for the same enhancement for Count 2 (Possession of Cocaine). Nevertheless, the written sentence as to Count 2 incorrectly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Johnny Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Kevin Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. Robert C. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API