Legal Opinion

Diamond Match Co. v. Silberstein

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1913No. Sac. No. 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County and from an order refusing a new trial. John C. Gray, 'Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is a consolidated action under the Mechanics’ Lien Law to enforce liens for material and labor against land and the building thereon owned by defendant and appellant Silberstein. Prom the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial Silberstein appeals.

• Defendant had entered into a valid contract with an original contractor, the Burnight-Kennedy Company, for the erection of a building upon his land for the contract price of forty-one thousand five hundred dollars. By the terms of the contract progress payments in the sum of two thousand dollars each, representing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. C.A. MacOmber v. L. M. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. A-1 Door & Materials Co. v. Fresno Guarantee Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. T. F. Korherr v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Mallard Pond Builders, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API