Legal Opinion

State v. Winson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1996No. 22179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s order affirming Orville W. Winson’s judgment of conviction for driving under the influence. I.C. §§ 18-8004, -8005(4). Winson claims, as he did before the district court, that the magistrate erred in: (1) instructing the jury that the instrument used to test Winson’s blood alcohol concentration was approved by the State of Idaho; (2) excluding two defense witnesses from testifying as a discovery sanction; and (3) admitting evidence of Winson’s breath test without the proper foundation. 1 After reviewing the record and applicable law, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaxtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. VondenkampIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State of Idaho v. Robert AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API