Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2002No. 26548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S PRIOR UNPUBLISHED OPINION DATED JUNE 5, 2002 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

JUDD, Judge Pro Tem.

Eluterio Martinez appeals from his rape conviction. He argues that the district court erred in excluding a late-disclosed defense witness. Martinez intentionally failed to disclose the witness to the State, and to his attorney. We affirm the witness’s exclusion as a sanction.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Martinez was charged with rape, Idaho Code § 18-6101, and with a repeat sex offender sentence enhancement, I.C. § 19-2520C(1). Martinez pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. LamphereIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. StradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HuntsmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. AlbertIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API