State v. Johnson
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
Lonnie Robert Johnson was convicted by a jury of grand theft. He appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s grand theft verdict. He also asserts that the district court erred by giving insufficient jury instructions, excluding a defense witness’s testimony as a discovery violation sanction, and assessing restitution, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments.
I
BACKGROUND
Around October 19, 2007, Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) reported the theft of copper signal wire that had been cut down from UPR’s signal poles. A…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Kimbley, IIIIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. Jamie Lee NelsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Russell G. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Thomas T. MelvinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. VargasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012