Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2010No. 35635PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Lonnie Robert Johnson was convicted by a jury of grand theft. He appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s grand theft verdict. He also asserts that the district court erred by giving insufficient jury instructions, excluding a defense witness’s testimony as a discovery violation sanction, and assessing restitution, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments.

I

BACKGROUND

Around October 19, 2007, Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) reported the theft of copper signal wire that had been cut down from UPR’s signal poles. A…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Kimbley, IIIIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. Jamie Lee NelsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. Russell G. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. Thomas T. MelvinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. VargasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API