Henry Kearson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, a Georgia Corp., and American Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Georgia Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Henry Kearson brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,1985 alleging that defendants Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (Southern Bell) and American Telephone and Telegraph Co. (AT & T) refused him residential telephone service after disconnection for nonpayment unless he paid an “excessive deposit.” The district court dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.
To state an actionable constitutional claim under section 1983, Kearson' must establish (1) that Southern Bell’s termination of his telephone service constituted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas B. Fullman v. Charles GraddickCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Everett L. Almon v. Thomas Harold Sandlin, H. F. Sandlin, and Carl D. NesmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Occhino v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by29 opinions
- Griswold v. Alabama Department of Industrial RelationsDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- Casado v. Miami-Dade Cnty.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Gibbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- Peters v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- White v. School Bd. of Hillsborough CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.