Legal Opinion

Occhino v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1982No. 81-2149PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Richard Lee Anthony Occhino seeks review of the district court’s1 September 11, 1981 decision which: (1) granted defendant Northwestern Bell Telephone Company’s motion for summary judgment; (2) granted defendant American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) Corporation’s motion for summary judgment; (3) dismissed Occhino’s claims against the Minnesota Department of Public Service and its employees Betty L. Ware and Robert W. Carlson; and (4) dismissed Occhino’s complaint, in its entirety, with prejudice. The essence of Occhino’s allegations in the district court was that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atkin Wright & Miles v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. West Coast Theater Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Henry Kearson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, a Georgia Corp., and American Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Scallen v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  5. West Coast Theater Corporation v. City Of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API