Hooper v. Glenn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.
The defendant reserved an exception to the refusal of the trial judge to permit him to amend his answer so as to set up a new plea of contributory negligence in these words, namely: “The defendant, Robert H. Glenn denies that he had used or was under the influence of intoxicants at the time of the accident, but avers that if he was intoxicated and if he and the plaintiff, D. W. Hooper, had been drinking intoxicants together, and the use of intoxicants by defendant Glenn was one of the proximate causes of the accident resulting in injuries to the plaintiff, then the plaintiff himself was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Wyatt v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Kjellander v. Piedmont Baking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Goode v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Beauchamp v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Park Terrace, Inc. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.