Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Railway Terminal Warehouse Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 1930No. 4868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia canceling assessments against certain property belonging to appellee, plaintiff below, for roadway paving and for laying curb.

The property in question is situated on Rhode Island avenue, in the city of Washington, and consists of two lots described on the plat, set out in the record, as 131/41 and 131/61. As to lot 131/61, it is conceded by counsel for the District that the assessments thereon cannot be sustained in view of the decision of this court in Johnson et al. v. Rudolph et al.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Johnson v. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crosby v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  2. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. R. v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Gotwals v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1932
  4. Willner v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Lake v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API