Legal Opinion

Gotwals v. Miller

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 6, 1932No. 5496PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is by the commissioners of the District of Columbia from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District, directing the cancellation of certain assessments for street paving levied against the properties in question, under the front foot rule, authorized by what is known as the Borland Amendments (38 Stat. 517, 524; 39 Stat. 676, 716).

We have ruled upon the validity of front foot assessments under those acts in a number of eases, holding that the assessments were void because of inequality and discrimination. Johnson v. Rudolph et al., 57 App. D. C. 29, 16 F.(2d) 525; Dougherty et…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  2. Dougherty v. American Security & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1930
  3. Taliaferro v. Railway Terminal Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
  4. Crosby v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. R. v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Willner v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API