Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Holt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, J.

Plaintiff, as payee of a promissory note, sues the defendant, as maker thereof, to recover the sum of $1,000, with interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. On the trial, plaintiff introduced the note, and rested. This was his legal privilege. Bigelow v. Burnham, 90 Iowa 300; Tuttle v. Becker, 47 Iowa 487.

It is obvious that, unless a valid defense is alleged and proved, plaintiff is entitled to judgment. At the outset we naturally inquire, What defense is interposed by the defendant-maker? It is fraud; but with the specific allegations in the answer we are not concerned on this appeal, unless it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Tuttle v. BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Commercial State Bank v. BeersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Farmers Savings Bank v. GrangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API