Legal Opinion

Cotter v. Phoenix Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 15, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Greco, PJ.

The defendant, Phoenix Insurance Company (“Phoenix”), has appealed the allowance of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and the denial of its own motion for summary judgment.

The plaintiffs, William and Linda Cotter (“the Cotters”), were insured by Phoenix for damage to their condominium in Concord for the year beginning December 13, 2005. It is undisputed that on September 1,2006, the Cotters suffered some damage to their property. They observed moisture on the ceiling of a study on the first floor that appeared to have been caused by some sort of leakage in the master bath…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Tate v. Department of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Doe v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Murray v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pangelinan v. PangelinanSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API