Legal Opinion
Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 19, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff bank sued to recover $105, the amount of a check drawn upon it payable to the defendants’ order and paid by mistake, upon presentment for collection, after the bank had received a stop payment order from the drawer. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed. It is undisputed that the bank was negligent in honoring the check. The question is whether upon the record the court was warranted in denying it recovery.
The facts found by the court, in so far as material to our decision, are not subjéct to correction and may be thus summarized: On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Leitzes v. F. L. Caulkins Auto Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Mansfield v. LynchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Casner v. ResnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Eastern Oil Refining Co. v. Court of Burgesses of WallingfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Reinhardt v. Passaic-Clifton Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Calamita v. the Tradesmens National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Dillon v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.