Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burlington City Board of Education v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1956No. 739PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, C. J.

In the beginning it is necessary for us to note that General Statutes Ch. 115 was revised and re-enacted by the 1955 session of the General Assembly. The new Act is Ch. 1372, Session Laws 1955, and is entitled “AN Act Rewriting, REARRANGING, ReNumberiNG AND AMENDING CHAPTER 115 OP THE GENERAL STATUTES, AND REPEALING Certain Obsolete Sections Thereof.”

This new Act has been codified as a part of the 1955 cumulative supplement to recompiled volume 3A of our General Statutes. It is designated as Ch. 115 of the 1955 supplement as it is in the bound volume. But the subj ect matter of the several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Abernathy v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Durham v. Rigsbee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Town of Selma v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF WASHINGTON v. GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Doby v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  5. State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API