Legal Opinion

Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Miller

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1969No. Docket 4,842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhoe, J.

The plaintiff utility corporation petitioned the Berrien County Probate Court, pursuant to PA 1923, No 238, as amended (MOLA § 486.251 et seq. [Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 22.1671 et seq.]), for condemnation of right-of-way easements across part of defendants’ farm for the purpose of constructing a high voltage electric transmission line.

At the conclusion of the trial the commissioners appointed pursuant to the statute by the probate judge made a determination of public necessity and awarded damages to defendants in the amount of $21,000, which was within the range of the testimony.

On appeal,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Marshall v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Totman v. Royal Oak School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Public Service Co. v. Decatur County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API