Legal Opinion
State Highway Commission v. Vanderkloot
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1972No. Docket 12394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
Plaintiff, Michigan State High*59way Commission, acting pursuant to the statutory authority granted it in 1966 PA 295 as amended (MCLA 213.361 et seq.; MSA 8.261[1] et seq.), deemed it necessary for the use and benefit of the public to widen and improve a segment of Highway US-24, a free access highway running in and through the Township of Bloomfield, Oakland County, Michigan. In order to accomplish this public improvement, plaintiff found it necessary to take the title in fee simple to certain real estate along said route, including a portion of the property belonging to defendants herein.
Actin…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Swisher v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Dukesherer Farms, Inc. v. Director of the Department of AgricultureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Michigan Ass'n of Railroad Passengers v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974