Legal Opinion
Rose v. General Motors Corp., Frigidaire Div.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 14, 1983No. C-3-80-389PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE; SAID REPORT ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY; DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS UPON DEFENDANTS’ FILING OF CERTAIN RULE 56 MATERIAL
RICE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. # 18) to the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate (Doe. # 17), which recommended that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment be sustained. For the reasons set out below, the Court finds said objections not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Badon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Richard Edwin Samples, Sr. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- McCreedy v. Local Union No. 971 UAWCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Adkins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- AMF INC. v. Computer Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.