Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rohr

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 3, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, S.

Numerous objections were filed to this account, but upon the trial thereof a number of them were dismissed for want of proof, some for indefiniteness and others were withdrawn, leaving for consideration, including the matter of construction: Cl) Whether the bequest for the perpetual care of decedent’s cemetery plot should be paid from the proceeds of the sale of the real property, there being no personalty; (2) whether those named in the residuary clause took a vested or contingent remainder, and whether the shares of those who have died since the testator pass into their respective…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. LittelNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Connelly v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Ham v. . Van OrdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. In re the Estate of KrugerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. Van Axte v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of SchneiderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  2. In re the Estate of CollinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of PickerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  4. Sterling v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  5. Estate Bernice P. BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API