Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Estate Bernice P. Bishop

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1943No. 2507Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOpinion Of Peters, J.

I respectfully dissent from so much of tbe opinion of the majority as affirms the action of the trial judge in sustaining the exceptions of the trustees to the findings and recommendations of the master in respect to expenses incurred for bookkeeping, clerk hire, collection commissions and bond premiums. Nor do I subscribe to any notion that the decree of November 15, 1920, constitutes res adjudicate, and forecloses the attorney general from challenging those items in this case.

Due to the action of the 1943 legislature in amending the law (R. L. H. 1935, § 3793) in respect to the compensation…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Lent v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. In Re the Will of ChapalNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Main's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API