Legal Opinion

Moore v. Littel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 172 opinions

The first of the above actions was brought by Herbert C. Moore, to recover the possession of a certain lot of land in the city of Brooklyn, claimed by the plaintiff' in fee simple, wherein judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, that he recover ten undivided eleventh parts thereof, with mesne profits as damages and his costs, was rendered in the City Court of Brooklyn; which judgment was affirmed in General Term in the Supreme Court for the second district.

Read the full summary

The first of the above actions was brought by Herbert C. Moore, to recover the possession of a certain lot of land in the city of Brooklyn, claimed by the plaintiff' in fee simple, wherein judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, that he recover ten undivided eleventh parts thereof, with mesne profits as damages and his costs, was rendered in the City Court of Brooklyn; which judgment was affirmed in General Term in the Supreme Court for the second district. (See 40 Barb., 488; 52 Barb., 9.) The plaintiff’s title was derived through a mortgage deed executed by Parmenus Jackson, and Edward C.…

1Opinion of the CourtWoodruff, J.

In. the memorandum of my conclusions in the"case of Sheridan v. House, submitted on points, in September, 1868, and which was made for the purposes of the consultation with my brethren, and not as an opinion for publication, (see 4 Keyes’ Rep., p. 569), I noted some views of the nature of the interest which under the grant from Samuel Jackson to John Jackson and his heirs, the latter had under the provisions of our statutes.

That memorandum is an imperfect exhibition of the reasons why, under those statutes, that interest is alienable, and effectually passed from the respective grontors to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawley v. JamesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Mead v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Miller v. . EmansNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Lawrence v. BayardNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  5. Striker v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. New York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. WinthropNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Doctor v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of DowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Livingston v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API